巢湖学院学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 46-53+70.doi: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2021.05.007

• 政法与社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

刑法因果关系的典型-非典型模式之反思

刘涛:湘潭大学 法学院   

  1. 湘潭大学 法学院,湖南 湘潭 411105
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-24 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-12-03
  • 作者简介:刘涛(1995—),男,湖南娄底人,湘潭大学法学院硕士研究生,主要从事刑法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目编号:16YJA820014)

Reflection on the Typical-atypical Model of Criminal Law Causality

LIU Tao: School of Law, Xiangtan University   

  1. School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan Hunan 411105
  • Received:2021-05-24 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-12-03

摘要: 必然-偶然因果关系说、相当因果关系说与客观归责理论的结果归属均是一种典型-非典型模式。该模式与常识主义刑法观、刑法客观主义以及报应性与预防性的关系形成内在契合,因而至今仍是刑法因果关系的研究范式。但是,典型-非典型模式不仅根基不稳、判断不准,而且无法适用于共犯领域。摒弃典型-非典型模式,是从结果归属不确定性泥潭中脱身的必由之路,也是构建单独犯与共犯统一归责模式的思想基础。

关键词: 因果关系, 典型-非典型, 客观归责, 单独归责, 区分归责

Abstract: Necessary-accidental causality theory, equivalent causality theory and objective imputation theory are all typical-atypical models. This model forms an internal fit with the common-sense view of criminal law, objectivism of criminal law, and the relationship between retribution and preventiveness, so it is still a research paradigm for the causality of criminal law. However, the typical-atypical model is not only unstable and inaccurate in judgment, but also cannot be applied to the field of accomplices. Abandoning the typical-atypical model is the only way to get out of the quagmire of the uncertainty of result attribution, and it is also the ideological basis for constructing a unified imputation model for single offenders and accomplices.

Key words: causality, typical-atypical, objective imputation, individual imputation, differentiated imputation

中图分类号: 

  • D924.1