巢湖学院学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 20-26.doi: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2019.02.004

• 政法与社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

论儿童违法骑乘共享单车的交通事故责任

上海发生的一起未满12 周岁儿童违法骑乘共享单车的交通事故中,儿童的监护人将肇事人与共享单车公司诉诸法院,该案的责任承担主体以及责任的具体划分问题成为审判关键。违法儿童具有利用漏洞解锁共享单车的过错以及违章骑乘共享单车的过错,故而首先应当由该儿童承担高于50%的责任,具体来说由该儿童父母自担监护不利责任,其次应当由机动车一方、共享单车公司、共享单车的前使用人按照从高到低的顺序按份承担“多因一果”的侵权责任。
  

  1. 方瑞安:华东政法大学国际法学院;薛宇:澳门大学法学院
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-11 出版日期:2019-03-25 发布日期:2019-03-25
  • 作者简介:方瑞安(1994-),男,江苏淮安人,华东政法大学国际法学院博士研究生,主要从事国际法尧国际私法研究。

Research on the Responsibility of Traffic Accidents Caused by Children Who Illegally Ride Shared Bicycles#br#

Recently, a traffic accident occurred in Shanghai where a child under 12 years of age illegally rode a shared bicycle. The child's guardian filed a lawsuit against the perpetrator and OFO company as defendants. The responsibility of the case and the specific division of responsibility have become a key point of the trial. If a child has the fault of using a loophole to unlock the bike and the fault of riding the bike illegally, the child should first assume more than 50% of the responsibility and the child's parents should bear the responsibility. Secondly, the motor vehicle driver, the OFO company and the former users of the bike should bear the tort liability from high to low in accordance with the "many reasons one result" liability.#br#   

  1. FANG Rui-an(School of International Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042);
    XUE Yu(School of Law, University of Macau, Macau 999078)
  • Received:2019-02-11 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-03-25

摘要: 摘要:上海发生的一起未满12 周岁儿童违法骑乘共享单车的交通事故中,儿童的监护人将肇事人与共享单车公司诉诸法院,该案的责任承担主体以及责任的具体划分问题成为审判关键。违法儿童具有利用漏洞解锁共享单车的过错以及违章骑乘共享单车的过错,故而首先应当由该儿童承担高于50%的责任,具体来说由该儿童父母自担监护不利责任,其次应当由机动车一方、共享单车公司、共享单车的前使用人按照从高到低的顺序按份承担“多因一果”的侵权责任。

关键词: 未满12 周岁儿童, 共享单车, 交通事故责任, 多因一果的侵权

Abstract: Abstract:Recently, a traffic accident occurred in Shanghai where a child under 12 years of age illegally rode a shared bicycle. The child's guardian filed a lawsuit against the perpetrator and OFO company as defendants. The responsibility of the case and the specific division of responsibility have become a key point of the trial. If a child has the fault of using a loophole to unlock the bike and the fault of riding the bike illegally, the child should first assume more than 50% of the responsibility and the child's parents should bear the responsibility. Secondly, the motor vehicle driver, the OFO company and the former users of the bike should bear the tort liability from high to low in accordance with the "many reasons one result" liability.

Key words: children under 12 years of age, shared bicycle, responsibility of traffic accident, tort of many reasons , one result

中图分类号: 

  • D913