期房案外人执行异议之诉是指案外人针对期房执行异议被裁定驳回后所提起的诉讼。此诉讼的关键在于，案外人就正在执行中的期房是否享有可排除执行的权利。当前，关于期房案外人执行异议之诉的权利裁判规则，在立法层面仍显模糊，司法实践中也面临众多问题。文章从91份最高人民法院的民事裁判文书入手，梳理审判实务中的裁判标准、审查路径以及裁判依据，全面审视司法裁判的现状，发现诸如期房权利类型不明确、物权期待权规则滥用、期房权利顺位规则不稳定等问题，皆为当事人纠纷之源。针对既有问题，提出完善策略，旨在为立法机关改善期房执行规则提供建议，为司法机关在期房权利裁判实践中提供参考，以期为期房权利主体提供更为坚实的法律保障。

The lawsuit against the objection to enforcement by third parties of pre-sale housing refers to a legal action initiated by a third party after their objection to the enforcement of pre-sale housing has been rejected. The key issue in this lawsuit is whether the third party has the right to exclude the ongoing enforcement of pre-sale housing. Currently, the legal rules regarding the rights of third parties to object to enforcement of pre-sale housing are still unclear at the legislative level and face numerous challenges in judicial practice. This article examines 91 judgments from the Supreme People's Court to analyze the standards, review process, and legal basis in judicial practice, providing a comprehensive assessment of the current state of judicial rulings. It identifies issues such as the unclear types of pre-sale housing rights, the misuse of property rights expectations and the instability of pre-sale housing rights priority rules, as sources of disputes among parties. Through in-depth reflection, it proposes improvement strategies aimed at providing recommendations to legislative bodies to enhance pre-sale housing enforcement rules and serve as a reference for judicial authorities in the adjudication of pre-sale housing rights, with the ultimate goal of providing stronger legal protection for pre-sale housing rights holders.