我国《民法典》第34条第4款是监护制度背景下为应对突发事件而确立的临时生活照料制度，但由于缺乏深厚的理论研究和丰富的实践探索，导致该条款的理解适用存在许多争议院突发事件的前提条件不明、监护人与被监护人的状态存疑、临时生活照料程度未定，以及费用承担不清等问题。同时，在司法实践中，援引该条款作为判定依据的案件以特别程序居多，司法适用性有待加强，迫切需要对该条款进行完善，限定条款语义，从而达到保护被监护人和维护社会和谐稳定的目的。

Article 34（4） of the Civil Code of China is a temporary living care system established in response to emergencies against the background of guardianship system. However, due to the lack of profound theoretical research and practical exploration, there are many controversies in the understanding and application of this provision: the prerequisite conditions for emergencies are unclear, the status of guardian and ward is questionable, the degree of temporary living care is uncertain, and the cost is unclear. Meanwhile, in judicial practice, cases that rely on this provision as a basis for judgment are mostly based on special procedures, and the judicial applicability needs to be strengthened. It is urgent to improve this provision, limit its semantics, and achieve the goal of protecting the ward and maintaining social harmony and stability.