通过梳理晚清学术著作对《毛诗传笺通释》的引用和评价情况发现，马瑞辰运用假借字判读的方法进行文字训诂既是对乾嘉学术的传承，又为晚清学者留下了足资借鉴的学术成果，其以三家《诗》证明毛《诗》所得出的学术结论，为晚清三家《诗》学者的研究奠定了坚实基础，但晚清学者在《诗经》学研究方面对马瑞辰的重视程度不足。分析晚清学术著述对《毛诗传笺通释》的征引和评价，探讨马瑞辰对晚清《诗经》学的影响，可以更加充分地认识马氏《通释》在清代《诗经》学史上的学术价值，对学术界此方面的研究起到补充作用。

Through combing the quotation and evaluation of Mao Shi Chuan Jian Tong Shi by the academic works in late Qing Dynasty, it is found that Ma Ruichen’s interpretation of characters by borrowing method not only was the inheritance of Qianlong and Jiaqing academic heritage, but also left scholars in late Qing dynasty with sufficient academic references. He proved Maoshi with three versions of Book of Songs, which laid a solid foundation for the scholars’ research on three versions of Book of Songs in the late Qing Dynasty. However, scholars in late Qing Dynasty did not pay enough attention to Ma Ruichen in their studies of Book of Songs. This paper analyzes the quotation and evaluation of Mao Shi Chuan Jian Tong Shi in the academic works of late Qing Dynasty, and discusses Ma Ruichen’s influence on the study of Book of Songs in late Qing Dynasty, so as to present a comprehensive understanding of the academic value of Ma’s Tong Shi in the history of studies on Book of Songs in Qing Dynasty, and supplement the academic research in this aspect.