政法与社会

阿伦特与马尔库塞现代性批判的比较研究及启发 

展开
  • 上海师范大学 哲学与法政学院,上海 200234
张潜(1996—),男,安徽六安人,上海师范大学哲学与法政学院硕士研究生,主要从事政治哲学研究。

网络出版日期: 2022-06-24

A Comparative Study of Arendt and Marcuse's Critique of Modernity and Inspiration 

Expand
  • College of Philosophy, Law & Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234
ZHANG Qian

Online published: 2022-06-24

摘要

在阿伦特与马尔库塞两位政治哲学家的现代性批判中都隐藏着“劳动”的话语。阿伦特否定劳动,批判劳动侵入公共领域造成人类公共性和政治生活的消失;马尔库塞将爱欲与劳动结合,批判技术理性和操作原则造成的劳动异化,提出劳动的解放就是爱欲的解放。两者分别阐释了西方极权主义将人化为“赤裸生命”的恐怖形象和用物质享受控制人们的温和一面。在政治的现代性危机中,人们既需要阿伦特式的判断与行动,也需要马尔库塞的爱欲与感性。

本文引用格式

张 潜 . 阿伦特与马尔库塞现代性批判的比较研究及启发 [J]. 巢湖学院学报, 2022 , 24(2) : 17 -23+75 . DOI: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2022.02.003

Abstract

The discourse of "labor" is hidden in the critique of modernity by Arendt and Marcuse, two political philosophers. Arendt denied labor and criticized labor for intruding into public space, resulting in the disappearance of human publicness and political life; Marcuse combined eros with labor, criticized the alienation of labor caused by technical rationality and operating principles, and proposed that the liberation of labor is the liberation of eros.The two explained respectively the horrible image of western totalitarianism turning people into "naked life" and the gentle side of controlling people with material comforts. In the crisis of political modernity, people need both Arendt's judgment and action as well as Marcuse's eros and emotion.
文章导航

/

〈 〉