2021年实施的《民法典婚姻家庭编司法解释（一）》规定了彩礼返还的三种情形，但过于概括式的规定对司法实践的指导价值却不尽如人意，司法实践中同案不同判现象需要得到重视和解决。运用实证分析法对2020年安徽省法院做出的95份裁判文书进行归纳分析后，发现司法实践中存在的彩礼返还责任主体不明、彩礼财产范围不明和彩礼返还比例分配标准尚未形成体系等问题是造成同案不同判现象的重要原因。针对实践中出现的实际问题，需要通过明确彩礼返还主体、明晰财产范围和丰富完善彩礼返还比例标准体系等路径解决，并将无过错原则等新规定融入具体对策中，为法院审理婚约财产纠纷案件时提供有益参考。

The "Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Code, Marriage and Family Edition (1)" implemented in 2021 stipulates three scenarios for the return of the wedding gift. However, the over-generalized provisions have unsatisfactory guiding value for judicial practice. In judicial practice, the phenomenon of different judgments for similar cases needs to be addressed. After applying the empirical analysis method to the 95 judgment documents issued by the Anhui Provincial Court in 2020, it is found that the subject of the return of the gift is unknown, the scope of the gift property is unknown, and there is not a standard system for the proportion of the gift return. These are an important reason for the phenomenon of different judgments for similar cases. In response to the actual problems that arise in practice, it is necessary to determine the subject of the gift return, clarify the scope of the property, and improve the standard system for the proportion of the gift return, and incorporate new regulations such as the no-fault principle into specific countermeasures, which can provide reference for the judicial practice.