政法与社会

刑法因果关系的典型-非典型模式之反思

展开
  • 湘潭大学 法学院,湖南 湘潭 411105
刘涛(1995—),男,湖南娄底人,湘潭大学法学院硕士研究生,主要从事刑法学研究。

收稿日期: 2021-05-24

  网络出版日期: 2021-12-03

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目编号:16YJA820014)

Reflection on the Typical-atypical Model of Criminal Law Causality

Expand
  • School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan Hunan 411105

Received date: 2021-05-24

  Online published: 2021-12-03

摘要

必然-偶然因果关系说、相当因果关系说与客观归责理论的结果归属均是一种典型-非典型模式。该模式与常识主义刑法观、刑法客观主义以及报应性与预防性的关系形成内在契合,因而至今仍是刑法因果关系的研究范式。但是,典型-非典型模式不仅根基不稳、判断不准,而且无法适用于共犯领域。摒弃典型-非典型模式,是从结果归属不确定性泥潭中脱身的必由之路,也是构建单独犯与共犯统一归责模式的思想基础。

本文引用格式

刘涛 . 刑法因果关系的典型-非典型模式之反思[J]. 巢湖学院学报, 2021 , 23(5) : 46 -53+70 . DOI: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2021.05.007

Abstract

Necessary-accidental causality theory, equivalent causality theory and objective imputation theory are all typical-atypical models. This model forms an internal fit with the common-sense view of criminal law, objectivism of criminal law, and the relationship between retribution and preventiveness, so it is still a research paradigm for the causality of criminal law. However, the typical-atypical model is not only unstable and inaccurate in judgment, but also cannot be applied to the field of accomplices. Abandoning the typical-atypical model is the only way to get out of the quagmire of the uncertainty of result attribution, and it is also the ideological basis for constructing a unified imputation model for single offenders and accomplices.
文章导航

/