对于新冠病毒疫情，我国政府果断地行使行政应急权并抑制了疫情的发展。为了保障国民的生命安全，本次疫情采取的管控措施之严格达到了空前的地步。有不少学者关注到行政应急权行使中存在的问题，尤其是对公民权利限制方面。部分学者对一些管控措施的合法性和合理性产生了争议。运用行政法的基本原则分析发现，产生争议的“症结”在于：紧急状态法制体系不完善、行政应急规范性文件缺乏监督以及行政应急权规制上的司法不协调。通过完善紧急状态法制体系、发挥合宪性审查制度监督作用以及明确事后司法审查标准可以化解这些争议。

For the new coronavirus epidemic situation, our government decisively exercised the administrative emergency power and initially restrained the development of the epidemic situation. In order to ensure the safety of people's lives, the strict control measures adopted in this epidemic reached an unprecedented level. Many scholars pay attention to the problems in the exercise of administrative emergency power, especially the restrictions on civil rights. Some scholars dispute the legitimacy and rationality of the control measures. Based on the analysis of the basic principles of administrative law, it is found that the crux of the dispute lies in the imperfection of the legal system of emergency state, the lack of supervision of the normative documents of administrative emergency and the judicial incoordination in the regulation of administrative emergency power. These disputes can be resolved by improving the legal system of emergency, giving full play to the supervision role of the constitutional review system and clarifying the standards of judicial review after the event.