野心的暴露与抗争——1930年代上海人力车夫纠纷案研究

唐民旺

doi:10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2019.02.014

巢湖学院学报 >

2019 , Vol. 21 >Issue 2: 97 - 102

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2019.02.014

历史与文化

野心的暴露与抗争——1930年代上海人力车夫纠纷案研究

唐民旺

展开

安徽大学历史系

唐民旺（1993-），男，山东菏泽人，安徽大学历史系硕士研究生，主要从事中国近现代史研究。

收稿日期: 2019-01-21

网络出版日期: 2019-03-25

收起

Exposure of Ambition and Resistance——A Brief Analysis of the Dispute of Shanghai Rickshaw Drivers in 1930s

TANG Min-wang

Expand

Department of History, Anhui University

Received date: 2019-01-21

Online published: 2019-03-25

Fold

摘要

摘要：1930 年代上海市人力车夫的生活状况堪忧。有鉴于此，上海英美公共租界工部局出台名为“建议十六条”的报告书。报告书涉及车租、工时等问题，这触及到包括车商、人力车夫在内的相关利益者的利益，引起不满和抗议。经过多方斡旋与谈判，纠纷案得以解决，而纠纷案暴露出来的是外国列强经济侵略的野心。此次纠纷案既是对帝国主义侵略中国的桥头堡——公共租界的抗争，也是对上海市政府的一种抗议，是中国下层民众抗争精神的一个缩影。

关键词： 《申报》; 人力车夫; “建议十六条”; 纠纷案

本文引用格式

唐民旺 . 野心的暴露与抗争——1930年代上海人力车夫纠纷案研究[J]. 巢湖学院学报, 2019 , 21(2) : 97 -102 . DOI: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2019.02.014

Abstract

Abstract:The living conditions of rickshaw drivers in Shanghai in the 1930s were worrying. In view of this, the British and American Bureau of Public Concession Industry in Shanghai issued a report entitled "Recommendation 16". The report deals with rickshaw rental, working hours and other issues, which touches on the interests of stakeholders, including rickshaw dealers and rickshaw drivers, causing dissatisfaction and protest. After many mediations and negotiations, the dispute case was settled. The disputes exposed the foreign powers' economic aggression ambition. The dispute was not only a protest against the imperialist invasion of China's bridgehead, the
public concession, but also a protest against the Shanghai municipal government. It was a microcosm of the struggle
spirit of the lower classes of the Chinese people.

Key words： Shun Pao; rickshaw driver; "Recommendation 16"; dispute cases

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract