巢湖学院学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 53-59.doi: 10.12152/j.issn.1672-2868.2020.05.008

• 政法与社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

论中国国际投资争端解决机构的创建——以弥补ICSID机制缺陷为视角

刘晶   

  1. 北京大学 法学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-17 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-10-28
  • 作者简介:刘晶(1991—),女,广东韶关人,北京大学法学院博士研究生,主要从事民商法尧国际经济法研究。

Analysis on Establishing Chinese International Investment Dispute Settlement Institution: From the Perspective of Remedying the Shortcomings of ICSID Mechanism

LIU Jing   

  1. Law School, Peking University
  • Received:2020-06-17 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-10-28

摘要: ICSID作为世界范围内主要负责解决外国投资者与东道国政府间投资争端的国际机构,在利益保护上不合理地偏向于对投资者私人利益的保护,面临着被加入国用脚投票的风险。同时,包括ICSID在内的当前国际主流的投资争端解决机制依然被西方话语权所掌握,对广大发展中国家的利益严重缺乏关注。在“一带一路”倡议持续深化区域合作以及中国不断促进外商投资的背景之下,中国已经成为了输出投资和吸引外资的兴业热土。以中国为主导,建立一个能平衡投资者与东道国的利益,能输出东方调解经验与智慧的国际投资争端解决机构,是当前的迫切需求。

关键词: 国际投资争端解决, ICSID机制, “一带一路”倡议, 东方调解经验

Abstract: As the main organization responsible for resolving investment disputes between foreign investors and host countries around the world, the unreasonable emphasis of ICSID on the protection of foreign investors' interest will bring the risk of being voted by feet by its members. Meanwhile, the current mainstream international investment dispute resolution mechanism is still controlled by western developed countries, and it pays little attention to the interests of developing countries. With the background of "Belt and Road Initiative", which deepens regional cooperation and promotes foreign investment in China, China has become a hot spot for exporting and attracting foreign investment. There is an urgent need to establish an international investment dispute settlement institution with China as the leading factor, which can balance the interests of investors and host countries and export the mediation experience and wisdom of the East.

Key words: international investment dispute resolution, ICSID mechanism, Belt and Road Initiative, eastern mediation experience

中图分类号: 

  • D996